Enter a description

SAV-IOL’s Lucidis IOL: all the benefits of a monofocal in a high-quality EDOF lens.

34 Likes, 10 Comments - Dr. Ladiñan (@dr.ladinan_oftalmologo) on Instagram: “Ayer en quirófano una LIO premontada se me quedo encasquillada a su salida. Como lo tenía grabado…”

Institución de Educación Superior sujeta a inspección y vigilancia por el Ministerio de Educación Nacional.

Se incorpora una nueva fórmula al catálogo de fórmulas de cálculo de lentes intraoculares. Se trata de la Fórmula de Kane, la cual puede considerarse de 4ª generación por trabajar con cinco variables.

Is visual simulation the best way to manage patient expectations?

Comparison of two devices to simulate vision with intraocular lenses Siegfried Wahl,1,2 Chengyang Song,1 Arne Ohlendorf1,2 1Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany; 2Technology and Innovation, Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH, Aalen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany Introduction: The simulation of vision with intraocular lenses (IOLs) prior to the clinical validation is of great interest for manufacturers as well as clinicians. We have tested the influence of different IOLs on the perception of contrast using different devices.Materials and methods: A Rassow telescope and the VirtIOL have been used to assess the contrast sensitivity function (CSF) through monfocal IOL (CT Asphina 409 MP, IOL 1), multifocal IOL (AT LISA tri 839 MP, IOL 2) and extended-depth-of-focus-IOL (TECNIS Symfony ZXR00, IOL3) in 21 participants, aged between 22 and 29 years. Contrast sensitivity (CS) was tested at various spatial frequencies (3–30 cycles per degree), using the Tuebingen contrast sensitivity test.Results: All tested IOL reduced the CS when compared to measurements with a trial lens correction of refractive errors. The analysis of the area under the curve of the contrast sensitivity function (AUC-CSF) revealed a significant reduction compared to the trial lens correction in case the Rassow telescope was used (IOL 1: P=0.008; IOL2: P

Article

Journal of Refractive Surgery | Following the 2014 update to the Graphic Reporting of Outcomes of Refractive Surgery1 to include vector analysis of astigmatism,2 the set of 9 standard graphs has provided a detailed 1-page summary for outcomes of corneal laser refractive surgery (laser in situ keratomileusis [LASIK], photorefractive keratectomy, and small incision lenticule extraction [SMILE]). Until now, the data reporting